SmartLight Analytics

ANALYTIC EXPERTISE - CLINICAL EXPERTISE

fraud

By

“Rehab resorts” recruit patients

Fraudulent claims from rehab facilities that function more as resorts, recruiting patients and even paying commissions for admissions, seems to be a growing trend.

Our past findings have been consistent with recruiting and clearinghouse practices well documented among some rehab centers. In such centers, patient recruiters typically receive payment from the rehab centers for each patient they obtain that generates revenue. Predatory marketing practices often involve a misrepresentation of the services offered and the auctioning of patients through clearinghouses. The clearinghouses route patients to call centers, and once the patient’s insurance is verified the clearing centers act as brokers auctioning off the patients to the highest bidding rehab centers.

“Rehab operators have told the Southern California News Group (which investigated the addiction industry in 2017) that they know it’s wrong to offer money to middlemen in exchange for well-insured patients, but that the practice is so ubiquitous in California they’d have no patients at all if they stuck to the high ground,” according to the piece titled, “Rehab patient brokering is rampant, but it’s hard to stop, industry says,” published in the Orange County Register on May 30, 2018, and written by Teri Sforza, Tony Saavedra and Scott Schewebke.

“Addicts start to see their insurance cards as credit cards, operators said, demanding better food, cell phones, even cash from providers in exchange for staying in treatment. If the provider doesn’t deliver, the addict bolts to a different treatment center that will give him more of what he wants,” the article stated.

By

Pass through billing schemes

“Healthleaders Media” recently reported on a case involving pass-through billing in Florida which highlights how such schemes can grow if undetected during regular claims reviews.

The case involved the owner of a substance abuse treatment facility who sent his patients’ urine samples to a lab that returned 40% of the insurance reimbursements to the owner. He then arranged with the managers of two rural hospitals in Florida to have the testing billed to private insurers at a higher reimbursement under the hospitals’ in-network contracts.

The scheme expanded to include rural hospitals in Georgia, and more drug rehab centers, resulting in laundering more than $57 million in illicit reimbursements.

Rural hospitals, often due to declining revenue, have been repeatedly identified in fraudulent and abusive billing schemes intended to increase revenue. Vigilance by those processing claim payments is required to prevent wasted dollars from being spent. SmartLight has identified multiple schemes involving suspect patterns of urine drug tests and pass-through billing.

Rural hospitals involved in pass-through billing to maximize reimbursements from claims administrators is a growing problem. SmartLight has identified over 7 hospitals in Texas and neighboring states involved in this abusive billing scheme in 2019. Analysis of claims data using inferential methods can quickly identify these suspect claims in an employer’s healthcare claims population.

By

CASE STUDY: Uncovering potential abusive billing

June 2019
 

During monthly monitoring of a client’s claims, the SmartLight Analytics’ team identified potential abusive billing by a licensed in-network physician who owns a family practice in Texas. The issue was identified due to an abnormal billing pattern in comparison to provider peers.  The suspicious claim pattern included repeated payments for injections without any associated drug codes stretching over a 9-month billing period.

The provider also reported an inconsistent diagnosis of chronic kidney disease for a patient, with no follow up service related to this diagnosis seen anywhere in the patient’s medical history. Additionally, this provider began billing allergy testing and antigen therapy preparation and injections for this same patient.

Records review of this provider’s billing showed references to numerous potentially excluded, unproven and non-medically necessary services including testosterone replacement therapy for male menopause, laser face lifts, laser hair and tattoo removal, laser-lipo body contouring, Botox and chemical peels. Claims not meeting medical necessity and coverage guidelines will be denied for this provider and credited back to the employer’s plan funds.